LATEST UPDATE: at Alma Realty’s request and with the Community Board’s consent, the public hearing will be put off until at least September.
Story originally submitted by LICA Board Member Mitch Nisonoff on 4/24/2010:
LATEST UPDATE: at Alma Realty’s request and with the Community Board’s consent, the public hearing will be put off until at least September.
Story originally submitted by LICA Board Member Mitch Nisonoff on 4/24/2010:
City Councilmember Dan Halloran (R-Whitestone) wrote an op-ed for the May 12th Queens Gazatte in which he claims that local community boards respresent “democracy in action” and that they are, in fact, “the epitome of democracy.” Come again?
According to the Queens Community Board website http://www.queenscb.org/qcsite/home.aspx : “Each Board consists of up to 50 unsalaried members appointed by the Borough President, with half nominated by the City Council members who represent the community district.” Having community boards structured as purely appointed bodies is an open invitation for self-dealing and conflicts of interest. For example Queens Community Board 1, serving Astoria, parts of Long Island City and Woodside, is loaded with architects and others with connections to real estate developers and also a number of “insiders” to the Queens County Democratic Organization.
Real democracy is based on accountability. In what way are community boards accountable to the people of the communities they serve?
Might it not be better for either all or a portion of community board memberships to be elected offices, which would open up nominations to the community as a whole and provide for greater diversity in terms of background and opinion on local issues? And might it not be better, in terms of accountability, for all or a portion of community board members to face the voters every two or four years?
For full text of Councilman Halloran’s article see http://www.qgazette.com/news/2010-05-12/Editorials/Community_Boards_Democracy_In_Action.html
From the Gotham Gazette by way of Queens Crap:
Earth Day — April 22 – marked the third anniversary of PlaNYC2030, Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s self-proclaimed “long-term sustainability plan.” While the city has taken many steps toward the plan’s goal of “a greener greater New York,” particularly in energy conservation, one gaping hole remains in the plan.
PlaNYC2030 left out any role for the city’s hundreds of neighborhoods, 59 community boards, and the countless civic, community and environmental groups that care about the future of the city. It was a top-down plan, conceived at City Hall with minimal input, and it was never approved as an official plan. In the long term this will only undermine the ability to sustain the plan itself, and both implement and improve it.
see http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/landuse/20100412/12/3239 for full text of article.
From 5/2 Queens Chronicle:
For residents of Astoria concerned about the recent spate of crime in the area, the 114th Precinct had a reassuring message on Tuesday — “Don’t worry. Everything is under control.”
At a packed community council meeting on Tuesday, deputy inspector Paul Vorbeck of the 114th Precinct and his colleagues briefed the community on steps taken to curb the growth of crime in the area. Revealing the year-to-date crime figures, Vorbeck stated that overall crime in the area was down less than one percent, while rape was down 30 percent. Grand larceny had dipped 17 percent, but he noted that there was an increase in burglaries — which had spiked to 32 percent.
Vorbeck told residents not to be alarmed by the statistic and reassured them that having more police on the Astoria beat would help curb the rise in burglaries.
For residents around 30th Avenue who have been complaining about the increase in noise and fights in the bars around the area, Vorbeck said their concerns regarding deteriorating quality of life will be addressed. He said that establishments that have been particularly troublesome will be scrutinized further as they renew their liquor licenses.“We can’t have people shooting and fighting in these bars,” he said. “We will review their licenses. We can’t have such establishments in the area.”
The deputy inspector said he had enough officers in his precinct to deal with any crime. Countering Councilman Peter Vallone Jr.’s concern that Albany’s budget cuts would hamstring the local police force, Vorbeck stated he had about 200 cops at the precinct. “Sure, I’ll take more cops if they give them,” but he pointed out that there was no statistical relation between the number of officers on the streets and the amount of crime.
“Many years ago, there were cops in the precinct, but there were more crimes too,” he said.
Anyone see a contradiction here?
For full text of article see http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20426272&BRD=2731&PAG=461&dept_id=574903&rfi=6